CSI CASEVIEW
SIGN IN REGISTER WHY?
POSITIVE OUTCOMES ARE NO ACCIDENT
Skip Navigation Links
HOME
WHY CSI?
SERVICES
ABOUT CSI
CONTACT US
CSI CASEVIEW
SIGN IN REGISTER WHY?
 
You're Losing My Verdict!
Avoiding the Runaway Verdict
by  George Speckart, Ph.D.
Senior Litigation Consultant
1  2  3  4  5

When these principles are not followed, the probability of a runaway jury increases. In addition, the following are suggested as a list of “Do’s” and “Don’t’s” in preparing an important case:

Do:

  • Check the credentials and background of a jury consultant.

  • Know the venue and the judge thoroughly before the completion of discovery.

  • Conduct exploratory research before discovery is complete.

  • Implement a modern electronic presentation system.

  • Incorporate research results into the design of demonstrative exhibits and graphics.

  • Train witnesses with a systematic framework that ensures all tactical objectives are met.

  • Ensure that all of the relevant case facts and issues are incorporated into the research.

  • Run Mock Trials until the case is jury-ready.

  • Insist on the compilation of a database that can identify favorable and unfavorable jurors.

  • Ask the court for a Juror Questionnaire.

  • Determine how jury selection and voir dire will be conducted well before the trial date.

Don't:

  • Put off research until a month or so before trial.

  • Allow plaintiff and defendant presentations to become slanted in a manner that biases the research outcomes.

  • Send witnesses into deposition until they have been thoroughly prepared with a systematic framework.

  • Use different trial consultants for different portions of the intervention system (e.g., one develops exhibits and the other trains witnesses).

  • Rely on hunches when empirical evidence provides a contrary conclusion.

  • Assume that experts are exempt from credibility problems, or that Witness Effectiveness training is not necessary for them.

  • Use graphics, demonstrative aids, charts, and other media without testing their persuasive power and “jury-friendliness” first.

  • Assume that jurors comprehend jargon, acronyms, or technical terms.

  • Allow various members of the trial team to countermand or revise a trial strategy that is formulated based on the research.

  • Allow opposing counsel to get their Juror Questionnaire to the judge first.

  • Relegate voir dire and jury selection strategies to last-minute preparation.
1  2  3  4  5
As a result of the pre-trial research, the defense knew "where the bottom was," but plaintiffs' counsel did not. Plaintiffs' counsel agreed to the settlement believing that they had a good deal, when in fact they had left millions of dollars on the table.
  SITE MAP     PRIVACY & SECURITY     CONTACT US © 2010 COURTROOM SCIENCES, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.